Many Christian And Torah-Keeping assemblies claim the “micro-chip” is the so-called “mark of the beast” as recorded in the book of Revelation, chapters 13 & 14. Personally, I’m fully convinced that it is not a physical micro-chip – it’s a spiritual mark. That is, you are either keeping God’s Commandments (Mark of God), or the traditions and pagan customs of man, which is the “mark of the beast”. (r. a. note)
What do they mean we need a bill to keep us from being forced to have some implantable chip? If you don’t want a chip, you don’t get a chip. The fact that the government wants to get involved tells you they will end up pushing something on the people.
Let’s face it, we all are chipped already.
You are attached to a cellular device that has wifi connectivity which basically provides tracking wherever you are. A personal listening device if you will. That’s what the CIA reminded us of anyway. (intro note from “World Events And The Bible”)
Las Vegas Review Journal By Sandra Chereb Posted Tues., Feb.14, 2017
CARSON CITY — State Sen. Becky Harris said a bill to prohibit forced microchipping of people is not as far-fetched as it might seem, because it happens in some places around the world.
Senate Bill 109 would make it a Class C felony to require someone to be implanted with a radio frequency identifier, such as microchips placed in pets.The idea for the bill came from a constituent, the Las Vegas Republican said. “As I began to look into the issue, I was surprised with the merit that I believe the issue warrants,” Harris told the Senate Judiciary Committee on Monday.
She said sales of radio frequency identifiers are escalating around the world, and a company in Australia as of June 2016 sold more than 10,000 implantable chips with do-it-yourself kits.
Harris said the technology is used by companies in Belgium and Sweden to identify employees.
“It’s done under the idea to unlock doors or use copy machines or maybe pay for lunch, you could use your hand,” she said.
Besides privacy concerns, Harris said the concept raises ethical questions, such as who owns the chip or the information contained on it, and how does someone get “de-chipped” if they are no longer employed by the company that required it. She also wondered if a chip could be hacked to harass or stalk someone.
Harris said the Nevada bill is modeled after legislation passed by at least 10 other states.
“It wouldn’t prohibit the voluntary decision of a person to be microchipped,” she said, adding that a nightclub in Europe offers microchipping to customers so the establishment can provide tailored service.
There was no total opposition to the bill, though some witnesses said the technology could help patients with dementia.
No action was taken on the bill by the committee.
Via: From The Trenches World Report.com